I'm not given to
epiphanies or "learn and grow" moments. I suppose I was during my
youth -- but then again, I was full of shit in those days. Though I'm less
prone to pseudo-satori than in the
past, I find that I'm more receptive to interesting ideas. The slavish devotion
to intellectual orthodoxy that handicapped me during my teens and twenties has
yielded to a certain "ideological agnosticism," if you will. I no
longer believe that any given philosophy or ideology has "all the
answers"; and bluntly put, I consider most top-to-bottom bullshit.
Having long since given up bandying lines from Atlas Outsourced like a fry cook slinging hash at a greasy spoon
("Your hunger is not a claim on my Happy Meal! I will never supersize an
order for the sake of another man, or ask another man to supersize an order for
mine! Are you listening, Hamburglar?"), I'm inclined to consider ideas
critically rather than dismissively.
This has done little for my sense of certainty -- but as one needn't be certain
to be right, it hasn't cost me much sleep. I agree with Rand's assertion that
man needs a philosophy (an integrated view of existence), but I draw the line
at "sieving" reality and discarding the bits that threaten to disintegrate
one's view(s).
I'll further agree that contradictions can't exist. Paradoxes and related
mindfucks, on the other hand, usually indicate that we're mistaking the map for
the terrain. When they occur, we're left with few choices: 1.) correct the map;
2.) ignore the discrepancy; 3.) try to force the terrain to conform to the map;
4.) deem topography a futile endeavor; 5.) dismiss the very notion of terrain
as illusory; or 6.) go completely batshit, run screaming into the night, and
either join a cult or spend the next few years living in a bottle/bag of
weed/packet of organic bean sprouts. Having tried all six approaches (and I'm
sure there are others), I've taken a shine to option 1.
Doing so hasn't made me any friends. (As a matter of fact, it's probably cost
me a few). It's destroyed any inclination -- however slight -- I may once have
had to be a "joiner" (in Faulkner's words: "I don't want to
belong to anything but the human race"), and it's played hell with my
voting record. It's also taken a big ol' mothafucka of a pimp stick to my ego
on occasion.
On the bright side, I'm neither in jail nor in the "skull orchard."
I'm more or less happily married (she snores like a chainsaw and drinks too
much coffee-- the foulest beverage on earth; I prefer tea), and I'm no longer
terrified of saying "I was mistaken" or "I don't know."
And I've gone on too long. None of the books on this list contains
(drumroll...) ALL THE ANSWERS. But they've all helped me correct the
"map," negotiate the "terrain" and put things in
perspective. The best require days to read, and months or years to hunt down
and peruse the bibliographical material. The worst (and I hesitate to use the
term -- they're all good) provide "crash courses" in high weirdness.
The Underground History of American
Education -- John Taylor Gatto
Propaganda -- Jacques Ellul
Blink -- Malcolm Gladwell
Tremendous Trifles-- G.K. Chesterton
The Ideological Imagination: The Rise of
Mass Bigotry in Our Time, and its Roots in the Thought of Hobbes, Rousseau and
Marx -- Louis J. Halle
Confessions -- St. Augustine
The Seven Military Classics of Ancient
China -- Ralph D. Sawyer (Ed.)
A Book of Five Rings -- Musashi
Miyamoto
The Sword and the Mind -- Yagyu
Munenori
Conversations With Socrates --
Xenophon
The Sixteen Satires -- Juvenal
Touched With Fire -- Kay Redfield
Jamison
Achilles in Vietnam -- Jonathan Shay
The Redneck Manifesto -- Jim Goad
Introducing NLP -- Joseph O'Connor
and John Seymour
Albion's Seed: Four British Folkways in
North America -- David Hackett Fischer
The Naked Ape -- Desmond Morris
Manwatching -- Desmond Morris
The Ominous Parallels -- Leonard
Peikoff
Emotional Vampires -- Albert
Bernstein
Inside the Criminal Mind -- Stanton
Samenow
And though I'm loath to recommend him, read Machiavelli. Except for Adolf
Hitler and Leo Strauss (neither of whom, one imagines, enjoyed acknowledging an
intellectual debt to a centuries-dead, "racially inferior" Katzenfreßer), Ol' Nick is still the
most pungent, lingering, influential fart in the elevator of modern American
political "thought."
Take a moment to stop and appre- ciate the memories you have made, the memory making opportunies around you and make someone feel special today.
Posted by: Jordans 4 | July 15, 2010 at 11:15 PM
I've been perusing The Redneck Manifesto on GoogleBooks... being the cheap gobshite I am.
What struck me strongly is how easily I could mistake Jim Goad's prose for yours. (That's not an insult, btw)
I know you're busy, but write more dammit!!
Hal
ps. call me you ignerint hillbilly
Posted by: Hal | July 19, 2010 at 08:42 PM